Thursday, May 24, 2012

Goldman sets $40 bln clean energy investment plan

Wed May 23, 2012 9:16pm GMT
 
By Lauren Tara LaCapra
May 23 (Reuters) - Goldman Sachs Group Inc plans to channel investments totaling $40 billion over the next decade into renewable energy projects, an area the investment bank called one of the biggest profit opportunities since its economists got excited about emerging markets in 2001.
Goldman executives said this week that demand for alternative energy sources will grow with global energy demand, and as big manufacturing countries, including China and Brazil, set more aggressive targets for reducing emissions. The bank plans to finance deals with clients' money and, to a lesser extent, its own funds.
Goldman, which plans to announce the new target at its annual meeting on Thursday, already invests in clean technology. In 2011, it helped finance $4.8 billion in clean technology companies globally, and co-invested more than $500 million in that area. The new target would average out to $4 billion a year, leading some analysts to minimize the target as more of a "charm offensive" than a new initiative.
In 2005, Goldman pledged to invest and finance $1 billion of environmentally friendly projects. By the end of 2011, the company had exceeded its goal, arranging $24 billion worth of financing and investing $4 billion into such projects, said Kyung-Ah Park, head of environmental markets at Goldman.
The bank's new $40 billion target applies to investments and financings for solar, wind, hydro, biofuels, biomass conversion, energy efficiency, energy storage, green transportation, efficient materials, LED lighting and transmission.
Goldman has also pledged to reduce its own net carbon emissions to zero by 2020.
Stuart Bernstein, head of Goldman's clean technology and renewables investment banking group, compared the opportunity to technology investments in the 1990s or investing 10 years ago in fast-growing countries like Brazil, Russia, India and China, for which Goldman economist Jim O'Neill coined the term "BRIC" in 2001.
"This is another emerging opportunity we think will be quite large," Bernstein said.
Enthusiasm for renewables was high in 2006 and 2007 as oil prices soared. But enthusiasm waned after the financial crisis cut energy demand and cash-strapped governments reduced subsidies for alternative energy programs.
The use of hydraulic fracturing technology to access abundant supplies of natural gas in the United States and elsewhere has also undermined alternative sources of energy.
"Obviously we recognize this is not the easiest of times in the clean energy market but nevertheless the underlying thesis as to why cleaner and more sustainable forms of energy need to scale up still holds true," Park said.
CHARM OFFENSIVE
Analysts and experts said Goldman may also be looking to score public relations points for a relatively small investment.
The bank has been on a charm offensive in recent months, after a former employee wrote a scathing opinion piece in the New York Times in March accusing Goldman of ripping off clients regularly. That was the latest in a series of blows the bank's image has suffered since the financial crisis.
"It's forcing a firm that had its roots in being private for a very long time to have to go out there and defend itself," said Michael Carrazza, a former Goldman banker who is now CEO of the private equity firm Solaia Capital Advisors. Promoting these sorts of initiatives makes sense, to show that the bank does some good, Carrazza added.

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

Obama budget plan ups renewables funding by 29 percent

By Anna Austin | February 14, 2012
U.S. President Barack Obama has sent to Congress his federal budget for fiscal year 2013 and has seemingly followed through on his verbal commitments to renewable energy delivered in his Jan. 24 State of the Union Address.
Also as promised, Obama has begun attempts to pull the rug from beneath the feet of big fossil fuel, with a repeal of 12 tax breaks to oil, gas, and coal companies to raise $41 billion over 10 years. At the same time, the $3.8 trillion budget proposal increases 2013 renewable energy funds by 29 percent compared to 2012.
In the budget proposal, the U.S. DOE is allotted $27.2 billion, $2.3 billion of which is slated for the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy for energy efficient research and development, biofuels, advanced vehicles and renewable electricity generation. While the DOE budget increases by more than 3 percent from 2012, the USDA budget decreases by 3 percent, to $23 billion in discretionary funding. Out of that, Obama has proposed $6.1 billion in loans to rural electric cooperatives and utilities that will support clean energy, and to promote renewable energy at electric generation, transmission, and distribution sites in rural communities.
In addition, through the Rural Energy for America Program, the plan provides $19 million in assistance to agricultural producers and rural small businesses to complete a variety of projects, including renewable energy systems, energy efficiency improvements and renewable energy development. More than $200 million is proposed to continue support for the development of domestically produced advanced biofuels.
To access budget documents, visit http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget.

Friday, February 3, 2012

U.S. investment market for woody biomass looks strong for 2012 as demand for wood pellets rises; regulatory changes expected to enhance picture

U.S. investment market for woody biomass looks strong for 2012 as demand for wood pellets rises; regulatory changes expected to enhance picture: U.S. investment market for woody biomass looks strong for 2012 as demand for wood pellets rises; regulatory changes expected to enhance picture
Senator calls on US to help biofuels’ development
2 February 2012

A US senator has called for congress to do more to support development in technology and biofuels incentives during a briefing at the White House.
Senator Chris Coons spoke at an American Chemical Society briefing, saying that biofuels production was essential for the future of the US economy.
‘This was a great starting point as a concrete forum to look at how we begin to move forward towards workable solutions that will require cooperation from many public and private interests to be able to move from the field to the filling station in the future,’ he said.
Coons listed the advantages that investment in biofuels could have for the US, such as job creation, economic development in rural areas and employment in all different types of sectors from growing the biomass to distributing the fuel.
He also discussed what individual companies in the country were doing to improve the production of biofuels and its development.
‘DuPont is deeply committed in investments to a diversified mix of next generation biomass and biofuels, those building blocks and the facilities necessary, those cellulosic production facilities as well as the development of bio-butanol and other drop-in biofuels,’ said Coons.
‘CMS is licensing what were formerly DuPont fluoropolymers selected impermeable memory technologies for the dehydration of biodiesel and other biofuels, a small plucky start-up the recipient of a number of critical SBIR and CDR grants that I think can play a key role in solving some of the production and delivery challenges,’ he continued.
He called for the Department of Energy and the USDA R&D programmes to extend tax credits for advanced biofuels and for the industry to work together on the Renewable Fuels Standard.

Monday, January 30, 2012

Buffet Ivest in Solar

Warren Buffet’s Berkshire Hathaway utility subsidiary, MidAmerican Energy, has purchased First Solar’s Topaz Solar Farm project.

Friday, January 27, 2012

Bernie Sanders Pledges Legislation Ending 'Absurdity' of Federal Fossil Fuel Subsidies

Mat McDermott
Business / Economics
January 25, 2012

Mark van Laere/CC BY-ND 2.0
We just learned, based on IEA calculations, if all fossil fuel subsidies were eliminated it would result in greenhouse gas emission cuts deep enough to get us halfway to preventing dangerous climate change. Indeed, cutting fossil fuel subsidies has been publicly mulled over for some time, with scant little progress made.
Now, at a rally in Washington DC organized by 350.org, Vermont senator Bernie Sanders has pledged to do something about that.
Sanders said:
One of the absurdities that foes on right here in Washington DC is that Congress keeps voting not for the interest of our children, not in the interest of our future, but for the profits of the huge oil and coal companies. ... The most profitable corporations in the world do not need subsidies from the American people.
Sanders pledged to introduce legislation repealing federal tax breaks to fossil fuel companies, saying that doing so would reduce the federal deficit by over $40 billion over the next ten years. (International Business Times)
Ending fossil fuel subsidies also made it into President Obama's State of the Union speech yesterday. Obama said:
We have subsidized oil companies for a century. That's long enough. It's time to end the taxpayer giveaways to an industry that's rarely been more profitable, and double-down on a clean energy industry that's never been more promising.
Given the chronic Congressional constipation of late, any legislation by Sanders or the President likely has an tough fight, despite the obvious climate, energy security, public health, and long-term jobs benefits of rapidly transitioning away from fossil fuels, facilitated by taking away support for polluting non-renewable energy sources and promoting non-polluting renewable ones.
But nevertheless ending fossil fuel subsidies in a rapid yet planned and measured manner, structured in such a way that the poor don't continue to get the sharp end of the stick, is absolutely what must happen.

Friday, January 20, 2012

Lufthansa: Biofuels Could Be Aviation’s Standard in Five Years

Lufthansa: Biofuels Could Be Aviation’s Standard in Five Years

EnergyRefuge.comPublished on Date January 18th, 2012 by EnergyRefuge.com
Posted in Category Aviation, Category Biofuel
TagsLeave comment »
Rating: 5.0/5
advertisement
Joachim Buse, Lufthansa airline’s head of aviation biofuel, last week said at an industry event in Washington, D.C. that biofuels could be the industry’s standard fuel in five to seven years.
According to Air Transport World, the airline executive said his company’s burnFAIR project has shown that biofuels are a feasible proposition for commercial flights from a technological point of view. What needs to be done now is to make sure there is enough production and from sustainable feedstocks. He told ATW that “from now on, it’s purely a commercial issue.”
One day before Joachim’s talk, a flight between Frankfurt and Washington using a Boeing 747 400 carried 40 tons of a biosynthetic fuel mix. Between mid-July and late December, Lufthansa had four daily roundtrip flights between Hamburg and Frankfurt as part of burnFAIR.
Joachim said that in order for biofuels to become a routine within the aviation industry, government assistance and commercial practices will be necessary. burnFAIR cost Lufthansa €6.6 million ($8.4 million). Out of the total, €2.5 million were covered with subsidies from the German government.
The use of biofuels by airlines is likely to revive the ‘food versus fuel’ debate. What do you think? Are biofuels a green solution for airlines, who account for an estimated two percent of the total amount of greenhouse gas emissions?
Article by Antonio Pasolini, a Brazilian writer and video art curator based in London, UK. He holds a BA in journalism and an MA in film and television.